Logic Online: Philosophy 105 0C1
Fall 2008
Thomas Bowen, Assistant Professor, Philosophy and
Humanities
Office and Phone:
Office Hours: TBA
Email: tbowen@oakton.edu
Prefix Number Name
Credits Lecture
Lab
PHL 105 Logic 3 3 0
Prerequisites
None
This is a study of the principles of correct
reasoning. Attention is given to such topics
as the logical use of language, types of definition, the methods of science and
the techniques used in evaluating arguments.
1. Students will learn to recognize
and describe the structure of arguments in everyday exchanges and in more
formal written material.
2. Students will learn to evaluate
accuracy of arguments.
3. Students will learn to recognize
common types of faulty reasoning.
4. Students will learn skills that
will enable them to construct their own persuasive papers with greater clarity
and sophistication.
Students
and employees at
·
cheating,
·
plagiarism (turning
in work not written by you, or lacking proper citation),
·
falsification and
fabrication (lying or distorting the truth),
·
helping others to
cheat,
·
unauthorized
changes on official documents,
·
pretending to be
someone else or having someone else pretend to be you,
·
making or
accepting bribes, special favors, or threats, and
·
any other
behavior that violates academic integrity.
There
are serious consequences to violations of the academic integrity policy.
Oakton’s policies and procedures provide students a fair hearing if a complaint
is made against you. If you are found to
have violated the policy, the minimum penalty is failure on the assignment and,
a disciplinary record will be established and kept on file in the office of the
Vice President for Student Affairs for a period of 3 years.
Details of the Code of Academic Conduct can be found in the Student Handbook.
|
Module One |
Weeks 1-4 |
Identifying, Reconstructing and Analyzing
Arguments Chapters 1-5 of the textbook First Graded Exercise First Exam |
|
Module Two |
Weeks 5-8 |
Formal Evaluation of Arguments: Deduction Chapters 6-7 of the textbook Second Graded Exercise Third Graded Exercise Second Exam |
|
|
||
|
Module Three |
Weeks 10-13 |
Formal Evaluation of Arguments: Induction Chapters 8-9 of the textbook Fourth Graded Exercise Third Exam |
|
Module Four |
Weeks 14-17 |
Informal Evaluation of Arguments: Informal
Fallacies Chapters 10-12 of the textbook Fifth Graded Exercise Fourth Exam |
Methods of Instruction
2.
Text Based
Exercises
3.
Online Exercises
(some provided by instructor, others found on the textbook website: http://www.wadsworth.com/pubco/pub_companion.html
Instructional Materials
Rudinow,
Joel & Vincent E. Barry. Invitation to Critical Thinking 5th
ed.
Elements of the Online Course
Methods of Evaluation
1. Four Exams: 20% each = 80%
2. Graded exercises (five over the course of the
semester): 20%
3. Grading Scale: 91% - 100% = A // 81% - 90% = B
// 71% - 80% = C // 61% - 70% = D // below 61 = F
Make-Up Work and Incomplete Policies
Exams should not be taken late. You have a week in which to take the
exam at Oakton (DP or RHC) or at another location. Late exams suffer a 10%
penalty per day they are late.
Graded exercises will suffer 5% penalty per day they are late.
On
Taking Exams
Each exam will require you to come to
Course Practices and Requirements
A. If you have a documented learning,
psychological, or physical disability, you may be entitled to reasonable
academic accommodations or services. To request
accommodation or services, contact the ASSIST office in Instructional Support
Services. All students are expected to
fulfill essential course requirements.
The College will not waive any essential skill or requirement of a
course or degree program
B. The Oakton Community College Catalog states: