|
II. |
Prerequisite: |
| |
|
| |
C grade or higher in EGL 101 |
| |
|
| III. |
Course (Catalog) Description: |
| |
|
| |
Course introduces strategies for planning, writing,
and revising advanced expository essays and the college research paper.
Content includes critical reading and analysis, the structure of argument,
and the use of sources. |
| |
|
| IV. |
Learning Objectives: |
| |
The student will be able to: |
| |
A.
|
Identify and apply strategies for planning, drafting,
and revising advanced expository, argumentative, and research essays
for academic audiences. |
B.
|
Analyze and evaluate various forms and
styles of argument. |
| C. |
Accurately and fairly represent
the ideas and opinions of others using techniques of summary, paraphrase,
and direct quotation. |
| D. |
Document source material appropriately
using MLA format. |
| E. |
Recognize the ways that other academic
disciplines document sources. |
| F. |
Use appropriate technology to identify
and locate sources for college writing. |
| G. |
Analyze, evaluate, compare, and synthesize source materials
and use them effectively in assigned essays. |
H.
|
Incorporate collaboration with others as part of the revision
process. |
|
| V. |
Academic Integrity: |
| |
|
| |
Students and employees
at Oakton Community College are required to demonstrate academic integrity
and follow Oakton’s Code of Academic Conduct. This code prohibits:
• cheating,
• plagiarism (turning in work not written by you, or lacking proper
citation),
• falsification and fabrication (lying or distorting the truth),
• helping others to cheat,
• unauthorized changes on official documents,
• pretending to be someone else or having someone else pretend to
be you,
• making or accepting bribes, special favors, or threats, and
• any other behavior that violates academic integrity.
There are serious consequences
to violations of the academic integrity policy. Oakton’s policies
and procedures provide students a fair hearing if a complaint is made
against you. If you are found to have violated the policy, the minimum
penalty is failure on the assignment and, a disciplinary record will
be established and kept on file in the office of the Vice President
for Student Affairs for a period of 3 years.
Details of the Code of Academic Conduct can be found in the Student
Handbook.
|
| |
|
| VI. |
Sequence of Topics: |
| |
| Sequence of Topics: This
sequence is an example based on the Prentice Hall Guide to College Writing and
adapted from Teaching Writing with the Prentice Hall Guide by
Stephen Reid.
|
|
Week 1: Course introduction; Review Chapters.1, 2; Diagnostic
essay and journal entries on cross-curricular topics assigned.
Week 2: Review purpose, process, and academic audiences for cross-curricular
topics; Conferences on topics, Library orientation.
Week 3: Review Chapters
5 & 6; Explaining essay in Ch 7 assigned;
Journal entries on possible explaining topics. Read Chapter 12.
Week 4: Workshops on collecting and shaping for explaining essay;
Library/field research; Editing workshops; Explaining essay due.
Week 5: Chapter 8 and readings; Evaluating essay assigned; Library
and field research.
Week 6: Workshops on collecting and shaping for evaluating essay;
Revised draft collected; Conferences on revision plans.
Week 7: Revision of evaluating essay, with reference sources cited
in text; Editing workshops; Evaluating essay due.
Week 8: Chapter 9 and readings; Problem solving essay assigned;
Journal entries; Library and field research.
Week 9: Workshops on collecting and shaping for problem solving
essay; Assign research log.
Week 10: Revision of problem solving essay. Conferences on revision
plans; Editing workshops; Problem solving essay due.
Week I 1: Ch 10
and readings; Arguing essay assigned; Journal entries; library
and field research; Assign research log.
Week 12: Workshops on collecting and shaping of arguing essay;
Conferences on topics; Editing workshops.
Week 13: Summaries of research articles; In-class discovery draft
of arguing topic.
Week 14: Workshops on in-class drafts of arguing essays; Collaborative
peer responses.
Week I5: Arguing essays due; Discuss final examination. |
|
| VII. |
Methods of Instruction: |
| |
Lecture,
discussion, and small-group work may be used to introduce and clarify
course topics. All courses will
include oral and written analysis of professional writing, primarily prose
non-fiction, and may include oral and written analysis of student writing. All
courses will include instruction in using the library. Grammar and
mechanics should be treated as appropriate to the particular forms of writing
taught in the course: e.g., thesis writing, incorporating sources, revision
techniques to improve style, etc. Written responses to questions
or quizzes may be included to encourage student preparation of assigned
readings. Some instructors may introduce word processing and/or invention
software. |
| |
|
| VIII. |
Course Practices Required: |
| |
|
| |
|
Reading, writing, and
revising as assigned. Each student will write a minimum of 4500
words of finished writing. Instructors
may vary the length and to some extent the types of essays, but
all of the writing assigned will be based on sources and all students
will produce a minimum of 10 pages (2500 words) of finished writing
based on multiple sources. |
|
| |
|
| IX. |
Instructional Materials: |
| |
|
| |
See the English Department Home Page for a list of approved texts. |
| |
|
| X. |
Methods of Evaluating Student Progress: |
| |
|
| |
|
Grades will be based on:
-
Faculty will provide a grading rubric like the one below
to show how writing will be evaluated. Grading rubrics
will take into account both the effectiveness of the writing
to a specific audience and purpose and the student’s
grasp of the conventions of college writing.
- Students will be evaluated in terms of their response to other
assignments, e.g. drafts, quizzes, etc.
- Students will be allowed and expected to revise at least some
of their writing in order to make it more effective.
- Students may also be graded on class participation.
Over 50% of the course
grade must be based on the formal writing assignments.
These grading criteria are an example, adapted from the Teaching
Writing with the Prentice Hall Guide by Stephen Reid |
|
| |
|
| XI. |
Other Course Information: |
| |
|
| |
“A” essays
satisfy the following criteria:
A. Focus: These essays have
a clearly identifiable main idea, thesis, or claim. The writer’s
purposes are appropriate for the writing situation. Promises made
to the reader early in the essay are kept. Expectations for the
reader are set and then met. Ideas, examples, and reasons developed
in the body of the paper are clearly related to the main focus.
B. Development: These
essays have ample supporting evidence: sensory details, specific
examples, statistics, quotations, or other data. The writer’s
assertions are immediately followed by supporting evidence. The
writer shows rather than just tells. Appropriate research (personal
experience, interviews, surveys, library sources) supports the writer’s
man idea, thesis, or claim. The writer shows how or why evidence
is relevant to main idea or claim.
C. Organization: The ideas
and paragraphs proceed in some logical and apparent sequence or pattern. The
writer uses sufficient audience cues to let the reader know what has
been discussed, what is being discussed, or what will be discussed. Structural
devices: attention-getting titles and leads, essay maps, summary and
forecasting statements, topic sentences, transition words and phrases,
and effective conclusions guide the reader from beginning to end.
D. Style: these papers have
appropriate voice and tone as well as effective sentences and word choice. The
style is appropriate for the purpose and audience. In addition,
these papers avoid problems in usage, grammar, punctuation, mechanics,
and spelling that interfere with the writer’s ideas or distract
from the audience’s pleasure in reading.
“B” essays
have weaknesses in one of the 4 areas:
A. Focus: These essays have
a clearly identifiable main idea, thesis, or claim. Promises
made to the reader are fulfilled. Deficiencies in focus may exist,
but the overall purpose is still clear.
B. Development: These
essays have good supporting evidence. Typically, support may
be thin or deficient in spots, but relevant evidence supports assertions
or general statements.
C. Organization: The ideas
and paragraphs proceed in some logical and apparent sequence or pattern. Occasional
deficiencies in audience cues may exist, but the overall shape is clear
to the reader.
D. Style:
Typically, these papers communicate clearly, but the voice may not
be as clear, or a few deficiencies in sentence structure, word choice,
grammar, or punctuation exist.
“C” essays
have weaknesses in two of the 4 areas:
A. Focus: These essays have
a clearly identifiable main idea, thesis, or claim. Often, though,
these essays shift the focus at some point in the essay.
B. Development:
typically, these essays do have some supporting evidence, but some
evidence is not relevant or some assertions or general statements
are left unsupported.
C. Organization:
Often, an overall pattern or sequence may exist, but the writer has
made little effort to guide the reader through the major ideas.
D. Style: Sometimes these
papers have a lackluster “Engfish” style, appearing to be
written mechanically to fulfill an assignment rather than directed to
a specific audience. Distracting sentence errors may interfere
with communication.
“D” essays
have weaknesses in three of the four criteria or have
one major flaw that seriously disrupts communications:
“F” essays
have few redeeming qualities. Typically, they are little more than
rough drafts that do not meet the requirements of the writing situation,
or they have major flaws that prevent communication.
|
| |
|
| |
Other Course Information: |
| |
|
| |
- Attendance policy
- For whatever information/procedures the instructor
holds the student accountable.
- If you have a documented
learning, psychological, or physical disability you may be entitled
to reasonable academic accommodations or services. To
request accommodations or services, contact the ASSIST office in the
Learning Center. All students are expected to fulfill essential
course requirements. The College will not waive any essential
skill or requirement of a course or degree program.
|
| |
January 2010 |