Marian’s Homepage Tom’s Homepage Animal Planet
Home Page Oakton Home
Animal Planet: Human Being(s) & Nature
“He who understands baboon
would do more towards metaphysics than Locke.”
--Charles Darwin
I. Course Course Course
Prefix Number Name Credit
Lecture Lab
HUM 127 Introduction
to Philosophy 3
3 0
EGL 129 Introduction to Literature 3 3 0
II. Prerequisites
None
III. Course
(Catalogue) Description
Hum127:
Course focuses on the most fundamental questions that human beings have always
asked. Topics include a critical examination of theories about reality and
truth, moral values and social justice, personal identity and free will,
aesthetic values, and systems of religious beliefs.
Egl129: Course introduces students to the
study of literature through readings in fiction, drama, and poetry. Content
includes terminology and methods for literary analysis and evaluation as well
as discussion of social, intellectual, and historical influences on these
literary forms.
IV. Learning
Objectives
Hum127:
A.
Students will
identify philosophical problems and learn to apply the methods of critical
analysis used by philosophers.
B.
Students will
study the answers that at least four selected philosophers have given to these
problems.
C.
Students will
develop their critical thinking skills.
They will examine criticisms of all the philosophical theories they
study and will debate alternative approaches.
D.
Students will
begin the formulation of the philosophy that guides their own lives.
E.
Students will
apply philosophical reasoning to issues outside the classroom. Students will learn to apply ethical theories
to concrete situations on the personal level, on the national level, and on the
global level.
Egl129:
A.
Explain the distinctive characteristics of the major literary genres –
through the use of exemplary works of drama, short fiction, and poetry.
B.
Identify and
differentiate between the conventions of drama,
short fiction, and poetry.
C.
Interpret the
formal elements of these works, using the appropriate terminology associated
with the specific genre.
Analyze works in the context of their literary, cultural, and historical
backgrounds.
D.
Synthesize
knowledge of genre, formal elements, and background material.
E. Incorporate secondary sources in the analysis and
interpretation of literary texts.
V. Academic Integrity:
Students
and employees at
·
cheating,
·
plagiarism
(turning in work not written by you, or lacking proper citation),
·
falsification and
fabrication (lying or distorting the truth),
·
helping others to
cheat,
·
unauthorized
changes on official documents,
·
pretending to be
someone else or having someone else pretend to be you,
·
making or
accepting bribes, special favors, or threats, and
·
any other
behavior that violates academic integrity.
There
are serious consequences to violations of the academic integrity policy.
Oakton’s policies and procedures provide students a fair hearing if a complaint
is made against you. If you are found to have violated the policy, the minimum
penalty is failure on the assignment and, a disciplinary record will be
established and kept on file in the office of the Vice President for Student
Affairs for a period of 3 years. Details of the Code of Academic Conduct can be
found in the Student Handbook.
Course Description for Honors Seminar:
Our concept of nature and our relationship to the natural
environment are functions of how we understand ourselves as human beings. As
humans we have a very intimate relation with nature that has served not only as
the resource from which we have gained our living, but also as a rich field for
sacred, political and personal rites and symbols through which we establish our
humanity. Nonhuman animals are the part of nature that has developed an
intimate and (potentially) conscious relation with us – as pets, companions,
entertainment, research subjects, predators, and food. Broader issues
confronting us at the beginning of the 21st century – global warming, resource
depletion, environmental degradation, species extinction – are understood in
relation to changing conceptions of human nature and human/nonhuman animal
relations. This core seminar explores key aspects of our current environmental
problems and examines important proposals for addressing these issues. During
the course we will take field trips to the
Objectives for the Core Seminar: these objectives supplement those above and reflect
the thematic and structural integration of the courses. In this Core Seminar
students will
A.
Analyze the
relationships between philosophical, literary and scientific discourses as they
represent nature and offer different perspectives for understanding humanity’s
relation to the natural environment;
B.
Identify, analyze
and evaluate central theories of human nature as these are presented in both
philosophical and literary texts;
C.
Identify, analyze
and evaluate the core issues, problems, and theories dealing with nature, the
human/non-human animal boundary, and human relations with non-human animals as
these are presented in both philosophical and literary texts;
D.
Analyze and
evaluate the core moral, ethical and political problems associated with humans’
relations with non-human animals and the broader environment;
E.
Discuss and
evaluate, both in writing and orally, the development of their own responses to
these core moral, ethical, and political problems making use of the materials
from the course;
F.
Analyze and evaluate
potential responses the core environmental issues and problems discussed in
class.
Course Practices Required
A. Attendance
This
class will function primarily as a seminar. This requires that you take an active
part in shaping and developing the content of the course. Thus, your
participation is a significant component of this class. The main emphasis of
this course is to discuss questions and issues related to the formation and
self-understanding of human beings in relation to nature, and to interrogate
how these issues influence our lives today. Discussion and conversation are
very important for learning philosophy and philosophical reasoning, as well as
understanding literature, and useful discussion requires at least two things:
first, you must be present in class, and second, you must be conversant with
the material. Students are expected to have completed all of the readings on
the day they are due and be ready to discuss them.
Attendance
will be graded in this course in the following manner: You will earn one point
for merely attending class; coming to class late or leaving early means that
you will only earn half a point for that day. Missing class, obviously, means
that no points are awarded for that day.
Note:
There are no excused absences for this class. Whatever the reason you miss
class; you will not receive credit for attending, since you did not. However it
is possible to account for missing AP points through extra-credit assignments
(see below).
B. Participation
As
noted above, this course will depend a great deal on student participation and
discussion. Thus, it is absolutely essential that you come to class having read
the material and thought carefully about it. Every day you will be responsible
for posing your own questions about the reading, and for responding to
questions from other students.
You
will be graded on your participation in every class discussion. Grades will be
assigned as follows:
“A” –
You always respond clearly and thoughtfully to the readings, as well as
questions and ideas posed by colleagues, such that you demonstrate a high level
of engagement with the texts and your peers. You also consistently raise
interesting questions about the materials. Finally, you creatively link your
interpretations, questions, and ideas to specific passages or images in the
text(s), as well as make significant connections between texts, writers and
filmmakers under discussion to contemporary issues involving the environment,
philosophy, and/or literature.
“B” –
You respond thoughtfully to the reading, such that you demonstrate significant
engagement with the texts and your peers. You raise some interesting questions
about the material and generally are able to link your interpretations, questions,
and ideas to specific passages or images in the text(s), as well as make
relevant connections between materials and artists under discussion and
contemporary issues involving the environment, philosophy, and/or literature.
“C” –
You respond to some questions and participate in activities, but fail to
demonstrate that you have read and prepared for class very carefully. You have
difficulty raising interesting questions about the material and cannot clearly
link your interpretations, questions, and ideas to specific passages or images
in the text(s), nor are you able to make meaningful connections between
materials and artists under discussion and contemporary issues involving the
environment, philosophy, and/or literature.
“F” –
You clearly demonstrate a lack of engagement with the texts and your peers. You
fail to raise interesting questions based on the course materials, or you do
not speak at all during class.
Please note:
You will receive an “F” for participation for any class from which you are
absent (independently of the reason for your absence). You will also receive a
“0” in participation for using cell phones, “Blackberries” and other electronic
devices during class.
C. Rules
for Class Discussion
What
follows are some simple rules that we will use to help foster strong and
meaningful discussion in the class. Every student must agree to abide by these
rules. So, read them carefully and make sure you understand them fully.
You must bring a copy of the reading to class in order
to participate in the discussion.
1.
Since discussion
is text-based, it is essential that everyone have the text.
2.
If you come to
class without a text, you will be asked to leave and not to return until you
have the text.
You must prepare (read and think carefully about) the
reading in order to participate in the discussion.
1.
Students who have
not prepared adequately will be unable to offer textual support for their ideas
and interpretations, and their responses to other students’ ideas and
interpretations.
2.
Remember that a
great deal of this class is about how to read carefully and critically, and how
to think about what you have read.
3.
The schedule of
readings may change over the course of the semester, so be sure that you keep
abreast of any changes.
You should be able to support your ideas,
interpretations, criticisms, and questions with evidence from the text.
1.
It is permissible
to make reference to evidence outside of the text –personal experience,
contemporary events, etc.—but only in support of ideas which themselves have
originated from or respond in some way to the text itself.
2.
If you are
responding to a comment or idea from another student, again, you should be able
to refer to the text in support.
You must be respectful to one another during the
discussion.
1.
In interacting
with one another it is essential to be respectful and considerate.
2.
Do not use
racial, sexual or ethnic slurs.
3.
Students who are
disrespectful or inconsiderate to others will be asked to leave the classroom,
and may not be permitted to return.
While there are a number of possible interpretations,
some interpretations are stronger than others.
1.
The idea here is
to learn together (and this includes the professors) –you should try not to
“wed” yourself to a particular position, but be willing to change your mind if
the evidence suggests that your interpretation is not as strong as an
alternative interpretation.
2.
Those
interpretations that are better supported by the text are stronger than other
interpretations.
3.
Part of our job
here is to discover the best possible interpretation and understanding of the
material.
D. Writing
Assignments: To satisfy IAI
requirements, you need to complete a minimum of 15 pages of written work
for each course in the Core Seminar.
v
Q&Qs. You are required to type up a quote and one
discussion question about each reading for each class. Thus,
for some class sessions you may need to write two quotes and questions, but
others may require four. Your quotes should generally be a short passage (as
opposed to one sentence or two paragraphs) that the class can close read. Your
questions should be open ended, and you might ask a question stimulated by your
quote, the week’s topic, or most likely, a connection between the two; your questions
should demonstrate that you have thought about the readings.
NO
LATE or EMAILED Q&Qs will be accepted under any circumstances. Both the
Q&Qs and the student must be present in class at the same time.
Sample
Q&Q assignments are attached to the syllabus, and below are criteria for
evaluation of Q&Q assignments:
A:
You identify interesting, insightful core quotes for the texts under
discussion, showing that you have actively engaged with the reading and
reflected on the main issues/ideas represented in the texts. You ask original,
imaginative and critical questions about the texts; begin to offer your own
interpretation; and forge significant connections between the texts discussed.
You present your ideas with clarity, in concise, elegant prose.
B:
You identify interesting core quotes for the texts under discussion, showing
that you have actively engaged with the reading and reflected on the main
issues/ideas represented in the texts. You ask critical questions about the texts,
but they do not demonstrate the substantial, consistent level of engagement and
reflection as an “A” assignment. You present your ideas in clear, engaging
prose.
C:
You identify a quote for each text under discussion, but without a clear sense
of why the quotes are interesting or significant. Your questions demonstrate
some thought and reflection, but do not show the same level of engagement with
the text, ideas, and issues as a “B” assignment. You present your ideas in
error-free, readable prose, but fail to demonstrate the attention to detail and
style that distinguishes “A” and “B” assignments.
F:
The quotes identified do not demonstrate a reasonable familiarity with the
text. Your questions are perfunctory and fail to show thought and reflection on
the text. Your presentation and prose style are unclear, due to errors in
organization and/or grammar.
v
Integrative
Essays. You will be writing two 3-5
page essays over the course of the semester (see schedule for due dates) that
ask you to synthesize the philosophical material with the literary texts. More
details about these essays will be available after the first week of class.
Criteria for evaluation of the essays are below:
A:
You actively engage with the course materials, effectively integrating the
philosophy and literature, and you show substantial reflection and thought on
the main issues/ideas represented in the texts. You ask original, imaginative
and critical questions about the texts; articulate a clear thesis; advance
interesting or surprising interpretations based in careful, accurate reading
supported with evidence from the texts; and forge significant connections
between the texts discussed. You present your ideas with clarity, demonstrating
logical organization, smooth transitions, and concise, elegant prose style.
B:
You actively engage with the course materials and your integration of the
philosophy and literature demonstrates a solid understanding of the main
issues/ideas represented in the texts. You articulate a clear thesis, ask
interesting critical questions about the readings, and offer convincing
interpretations supported with evidence, as well as develop meaningful
connections between the texts. You present your ideas with clarity in
organization and an engaging prose style.
C:
You engage with course materials and your integration of the philosophy and
literature demonstrates at least a basic understanding of the main issues/ideas
represented in the texts under consideration. You attempt to develop questions
about the readings and are able to offer interpretations based in evidence but
fail to demonstrate substantial, nuanced reflection on the texts. You offer an
organized argument in clear, readable prose, but fail to demonstrate the
careful attention to detail and style that distinguishes “A” and “B” essays.
D:
You fail to meet minimum length and/or content requirements for the integrative
essay. Your integration of the philosophy and literature fails to demonstrate a
clear grasp of the material. Though you may attempt to ask questions or offer
an interpretation of the text, your attempt is weakened by failure to address
specific issues/ideas, or by lack of attention to organization and style.
F:
Essay meets virtually none of the requirements or is simply not done or plagiarized.
E. Exams
There
will be a total of three exams given throughout the semester. Each exam will
combine both components of the course (philosophy and literature). Generally,
the exams will include questions that are specific to philosophy and literature,
and questions that ask students to relate these two disciplines to one another.
F. Portfolio
You are required to maintain a “course portfolio”
where you preserve all of your course work. The portfolio will be turned in at the
end of the semester. It should include all Q&Qs, the two integrative
essays, and the exams.
Late Assignments and
Absences.
a) It is important to remember
that there are no excused absences from this class. Whatever the reason for
missing class, if you are not there, then you cannot earn the AP points.
b) Q&Qs cannot be turned in
late or emailed for any reason.
c) Integrative papers are due in class at the beginning of
class; we will not accept e-mailed submissions under any circumstances. Late
essays will be dropped the point equivalent of one full letter grade for each
class period after which they arrive. If you miss a class, you are still
responsible for turning in papers either to the Division III office of the Des
Plaines Campus, Room 2430, or to our offices during office hours. If you have
difficulty completing an essay within the scheduled time frame and you wish to
receive an extension, you need to notify us at least 24 hours in advance.
Please
note: an assignment is considered late if it is turned in any time
after the class during which it is due (even if it is only one minute after
class has ended).
d)
You can take the exams late (in the testing center) –but you are
responsible for making the arrangements. Any exam taken late will have 10% of
the grade deducted.
Attendance: 5%
Participation: 20%
Integrative Essays: 20%
Q&Qs: 25%
Exams: 30%
Grading Scale: 91% - 100% = A // 81% - 90%
= B // 71% - 80% = C // 61% - 70% = D // below 61 = F
Statement on Tolerance, Non-Discrimination and Respect:
a) Listen and give careful consideration to
all ideas expressed in class, especially those that are different from our own,
without attacking or demeaning the people who have these views; this means
attending to the discussion and not conversing with other students when either
one of the professors or another student is talking;
b) Avoid using insulting terms or telling offensive
jokes when talking to or about individuals or groups;
c) Turn off your cell-phone or PDA before you
come to class, and do not call or text people while class is in session;
d)
Do not come to
class late, leave during the middle, or wander in and out —particularly when
someone else is talking, as this is distracting, as well as rude. Of course,
you may leave to use the restroom (Please, don’t ask us!), but it makes more
sense and is far more respectful to take care of personal business before class
begins or after it ends;
e)
Do not come to
class and do work for another course, troll the internet, or sleep – if you
want to do any of those, simply go somewhere else.
If you have a documented learning, psychological, or physical disability, you may be entitled to reasonable academic accommodations or services. To request accommodation or services, contact the ASSIST office in Instructional Support Services. All students are expected to fulfill essential course requirements. The College will not waive any essential skill or requirement of a course or degree program.
Important Dates
January 19: Spring 2010 semester
classes begin
January 23 noon: Last day to submit proof
of residency, business service agreements and chargebacks/joint agreements
February 14: Last day to withdraw from
16-week courses and have course dropped from record. Last day to change to
audit for 16-week courses
February 15: Presidents' Day holiday,
College closed
February 21: Incomplete (I) grades
from fall 2009 semester for which faculty have not submitted final grades will
become an "F" after this date.
March 12 noon: Last day for filing
Graduation Petitions
March 14: Last day to withdraw with
a "W" from 16-week courses; Students will receive a grade in all
courses in which they are enrolled after March 14.
March 15 – March 21: Spring recess
March 22: Classes resume after
Spring recess
March 29: Registration opens for
summer 2010 sessions
April 12: Registration opens for
fall 2010 semester
May 13, 14: Evaluation Days
May 14: Last day of student attendance
May 18: Commencement
Coupons:
|
One Free Absence You can
use this coupon to take the place of one missed class period. Name:
_____________________________ Date of
Missed Class: _________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
One Free Absence You can
use this coupon to take the place of one missed class period. Name:
_____________________________ Date of
Missed Class: _________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
|
Get Out of Participation Free You can use
this coupon to “get out of participation” while still attending class; or if
you have missed a class. Name:
________________________________ Date of
Discussion: ______________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
Get Out of Participation Free You can
use this coupon to “get out of participation” while still attending class; or
if you have missed a class. Name:
________________________________ Date of
Discussion: ______________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
|
One Q&Q Relief You can
use this coupon to get out of doing one day’s worth of Q&Qs. Name:
______________________________ Relief
Date: __________________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
One Q&Q Relief You can use
this coupon to get out of doing one day’s worth of Q&Qs. Name:
______________________________ Relief
Date: __________________________ (This coupon can only be used once.) |
Sample Q&Q Assignment:
Tom
Bowen and Marian Staats
HUM127/EGL129
1.16.08
Vogel, “Nature as Origin and
Difference: On Environmental Philosophy and Continental Thought.”
Quote: If nature
gave rise to everything, then nature gave rise to us too, and to everything we produce,
including superhighways and strip mines—and so pure nature turns out not to be
so hard to find, nor so difficult to protect, nor for that matter so charming.
On the other hand, if “unnatural” means “artificial” then all human action
turns out to violate nature. 299
Questions:
Though
this quote does not represent Vogel’s core thesis, it identifies a primary
problem associated with the concept of nature and its deployment in
environmental philosophy and politics, as the main issue articulated has to do
with using “nature” as the source for standards of judging human activity. If
the “rightness” or “wrongness” of our behavior is embedded in nature, then we
fall into this problem: either everything we do is natural, hence right; or
everything we do is unnatural, hence wrong. Does attempting to evaluate human
actions depend upon finding a standard in
nature? Is it the case that all attempts to articulate a “natural standard”
fall prey to the naturalistic fallacy? What happens when we remove “natural” origins
for moral imperatives? Is relativism the inevitable result? Consider Vogel’s
own response: that he can “find” a standard or moral imperative “in practice
itself” (306). How does this differ from finding it in nature? How might
“practice” give rise to an “ethical imperative towards self-knowledge” (306),
and does such self-knowledge necessarily guarantee an ethical relation to
nature? Certainly Sweeney Todd had achieved some measure of self-knowledge upon
his return to
Leopold:
“The Land Ethic”
Quote: It is inconceivable to me that an ethical
relation to land can exist without love, respect, and admiration for land, and a high regard for
its value. By value, I of course mean something far broader than mere economic value; I mean
value in the philosophical sense. (426)
Questions:
What
does Leopold mean here by “value in the philosophical sense”? Economic value
usually refers to some form of utility or extrinsic value, which suggests here
that philosophical value refers to an intrinsic or inherent value. However,
some questions remain: inherent in what properties or characteristics, and how
do we articulate this value? He suggests, for instance, that the song-birds and
wild flowers that “have no economic value” have intrinsic value as “members of
the biotic community” and that this community has value in terms of its
stability and integrity (455). In closing he also notes that “a thing is right
when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic
community” (463). How does this relate to Vogel’s notion of practice? Does
Leopold rely on an underlying conception of “Nature as Origin”, and hence fall
victim to the critique of this conception articulated by Vogel? Can one impute
an “intrinsic” value to nature without relying on “Nature as Origin”?
Eiseley:
“The Bird and the Machine”
Quote: “On the other hand…” Ah, my mind takes up, on
the other hand the machine does not bleed, ache, hang for hours in the empty
sky in a torment of hope to learn the fate of another machine, nor does it cry
out with joy nor dance in the air with the fierce passion of a bird. Far off,
over a distance greater than space, that remote cry from the heart of heaven
makes a faint buzzing among my breakfast dishes and passes on and away. (185)
Questions:
Here
Eiseley articulates a classic distinction between “nature” and “artifice”:
natural beings are passionate, joyful and dance, but artificial things do not.
Yet, is the distinction so clear? Are not birds themselves a form of machine (an
organic machine)? What would happen if we produced an artifact that could do
all of these things, or at least, behave as
though it did all of these things? (Consider the animal-droids in Blade Runner or Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, or the cloned or genetically
engineered animals produced in laboratories.) Does the ethical significance of
Eiseley’s decision to release the hawk and his general relation to the
wilderness depend upon a clear division between natural and artificial? If it
does, how might we read Eiseley through the critiques of such a distinction
developed in Vogel’s essay? Further, does his decision to free the hawk and his
pleasure in seeing the hawk rejoin its mate resonate with Leopold’s notion of
the Land Ethic, and does his account productively imagine the “value in the
philosophical sense” that Leopold calls for (462)? Or, is the vision too
narrow, too anthropomorphized, too focused on these particular birds and not on
the over-all biotic community? Does the Land Ethic provide for a respect and
admiration of individual creatures (animal, vegetable, mineral—to speak
metaphorically) as individual creatures,
or merely as parts of the biotic community?