Schedule of Readings: Second Unit
|
Week 5 |
Transition
to Epistemology |
|
Mon 2/13 |
First Exam |
|
Weds 2/15 |
Read: Waller, Chapter 3: 63-70 Discussion: Come to class prepared to talk
about skepticism and the Copernican Revolution. Consider how you would answer
exercise questions 1 & 2 (pages 86-87) |
|
Week 6 |
Descartes’
Quest for Certainty |
|
Mon 2/20 |
NO CLASS—President’s Day. |
|
Weds 2/22 |
Read: Waller, Chapter 3: 70-75) Read: Descartes, Meditations 1-2 (Waller, 75-82) Discussion: When reading Descartes try to work
through his argument. Pay particular attention to how he goes about doubting everything, why he can’t doubt his own existence, and what standard he uses to distinguish between doubt and certainty
(how would you define these terms? How do you distinguish between things you
are certain of, and things you doubt?) |
|
Week 7 |
Descartes’
Quest for Certainty & The Problem of the External World |
|
Mon 2/27 |
Read: Descartes, Meditations 3 (through MyPhilosophy Lab
or online at: http://www.classicallibrary.org/descartes/meditations/6.htm. Remember to bring the text to
class.) Discussion: The problem of solipsism. As you
read this meditation develop answers to the following questions: (a) why does
Descartes have to prove God’s
existence? (b) what is the precise argument that he uses to prove God’s
existence? (c) Is this argument conclusion? Does it convince you? Where is it
strong/weak? |
|
Weds 2/29 |
Read: Descartes, Meditations 4
(through MyPhilosophy Lab or online at: http://www.classicallibrary.org/descartes/meditations/7.htm. Remember to bring the text to
class.) Read: Waller, Chapter 4: 91-95
(Rationalism) Discussion: Falsehood and error. Why is it
important to explain error and falsehood? What is the cause of error? What
does this tell us about human
nature, and what does it tell us about God’s
nature? |
|
Week 8 |
Empiricism,
Humean Skepticism, and Kant’s Synthesis |
|
Mon 3/5 |
Read: Waller, Chapter 4: 95-101 Read: Hume, selections in Waller 104-113 Discussion: How is empiricism different from
rationalism? Which approach to understanding knowledge appeals to you so far?
Why? What are the problems with empiricism? Why, importantly, does Hume adopt
a skeptical approach to human
knowledge? How does Hume differ from Locke? |
|
Weds 3/7 |
Read: Hume, Dialogues on Natural Religion (handout) Discussion: Empiricism and religion. Can we
use the natural world as proof of God’s existence? |