Home Up General Comments on Course Journals HUM 120 Syllabus PHL 230 Syllabus PHL 230 1st Study Guide PHL 230 2nd Study Guide PHL 230 3rd Study Guide Early Christian Philosophy PHL 230 4th Study Guide Islamic Philosophy Reading Questions PHL 230 4th Study Guide HUM 120 1st Study Guide HUM 120 2nd Study Guide HUM 120 3rd Study Guide HUM 120 4th Study Guide HUM 120 Last Study Guide Reading Questions for Anselm and Aquinas

 

      



Study Guide for the First Quiz (PHL 230 0H1)

 

The quiz will be given at the beginning of class on September 8th, at 11:00. You will have between 15-20 minutes to complete the quiz. In general, all quizzes will be composed of a series of short answer questions from which you must choose 5 to answer. This study guide is split into two parts. First, some hints on studying for these quizzes in general, and second, a brief review of the content that will be covered in the first quiz.

 

General Study Tips (as it were).

 

  1. First, every quiz focuses specifically on the readings. Thus, all questions will be drawn from and will ask you about the specific readings for that period of the course. Clearly, then, one necessary component of study is to read the material and to read it closely and carefully (multiple times is my recommendation).
  2. Second, while you are reading the material you should take notes. In particular, you should make note of major concepts, themes, ideas, positions, and –most importantly—arguments that are presented in the readings. There will often be some questions that will ask you to summarize or paraphrase arguments from the readings –should a good study tool is to practice such summaries.
  3. Third, the “reading questions” provided at the beginning of the semester bear a striking similarity to the types of questions that will appear on the quizzes. So, being able to answer these questions –in a few sentences—will also provide you with practice for taking the quizzes. (Being able to provide longer, more detailed and nuanced responses to these types of questions –which you can practice in your journals—will also aid you in taking the final exam.)
  4. Fourth, often the quizzes will focus on one philosopher; however, there may be periods where more than one philosopher or philosopher’s works are covered in the quiz. As a result, you can expect some questions that will ask you to contrast and compare the ideas of two philosophers about a particular concept or subject matter. So, it is a good idea to practice working out short comparisons and contrasts between the philosophers on various matters (e.g. Parmenides vs. Heraclitus on the status of the logos and/or change; Plato vs. Aristotle on the nature of form or its relative position in rational explanation (logos), etc.).
  5. Fifth, unless the quiz question specifically asks you to “list” or “provide a single word response” to one of the questions, you should be prepared to write in complete legible sentences. And, so, of course, practice doing this.
  6. Finally, it is always a good idea to ask as many questions as you can about the material in order to enhance your understanding, and to offer up your own theories for how the material should be understood –this is always a good way to learn anything.

 

The following material will be covered on the first quiz.

 

  1. The Pre-Socratics: The Milesians (Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes).
    1. Know the basic “theory” or explanation that they offer to explain the origin of the world (their cosmogony);
    2. Know what are the threads that tie them together (aside from the fact that they all worked in the city of Miletus);
    3. Know the basic question(s) that motivated their thought –what were they trying to account for in their work.

  2. The Pre-Socratics: Heraclitus.
    1. Know the basic outlines of Heraclitus’ conception of the world;
    2. Know the particular conception of logos at work in Heraclitus –how this differs from the Milesians, on the one hand, and Parmenides/Zeno on the other.
    3. Know the particular question(s) that motivated his thought –what he was trying to account for in his work.

 

  1. The Pre-Socratics: The Eleatics
    1. Know the basic outlines of the Eleatic conception of the world;
    2. Know the basic argument(s) provided in Parmenides “prose-poem” –in particular the “three ways of approach” and the problem of non-being.
    3. Know the basic “paradoxes” that Zeno uses to defend the Eleatic conception of the world –and how they were supposed to do this.
    4. Know the particular conception of logos at work in the Eleatic philosophy –how this differs from Heraclitus in particular.
    5. Know the particular question(s) that motivated Eleatic philosophy –what they were trying to account for in their work.

  2. Socrates: Euthyphro.
    1. Know the basic characters and them of the dialogue;
    2. Know the primary arguments undertaken in the dialogue (the various definitions of piety and the Socratic analysis of these definitions).
    3. Know the point of the dialogue –what was accomplished (if anything).